Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the Smok Novo 2 cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are plenty of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.